Scott Freeman

    The Best Thoughts in Life are Free

    Browsing Posts published in June, 2006

    I know this quote is long but I encourage to reflect on what is said. Don’t just react if you disagree, but prayerfully consider our need to reassess our faithfulness. It is from Michael Lerner’s tremendous, insightful and indicting book, The Left Hand of God:

    When Jews were enslaved by Egyptian imperial power, they were subjected to genocidal measures on the part of Pharoah (who sought to kill all the male children), constant physical oppression, material deprivation, and religious repression. It was in this context that they responded to the death of the Egyptian army sinking into the waters of the sea by celebrating God as “a man of war: and proclaiming, “Your Right Hand O Lord, is Mighty in Power” (Exodus 15:3–6)

    Yet history often shows that this is a difficult balance to maintain, because once one justifies using violence and domination over others in some circumstances to overthrow oppressive rule, one can develop a psychological proclivity for using violence to solve one’s pressing problems.

    What the prophets saw, and what has happened once again in contemporary Israel, is that the Torah tradition could be used to justify a social order that was in many respects the exact opposite of the loving message of God. When the message of the Right Hand of God, developed for the powerless, is adopted instead by the powerful, existing inequalities and systems of oppression are ignored and calls for social justice, peace and nonviolence are dismissed as pretty thoughts about some future messianic era (for Jews) or a Second Coming (for Christians). Arguing that the “real world” is too dangerous for the demands of the Torah, the Prophets, and Jesus to be taken seriously, the powerful insist that the only path to peace and social justice is to impose their own religous vision on the whole world, and to accept cruelty and injustice as inevitable until that apocalyptic transformation has taken place. The purveyors of this distortion can always refer, as they always have, to external threats as evidence that the world is not yet ready for the transformative call of the Left Hand of God.

    Jesus railed against the Jewish establishment of his day, like other prophets had done in their own time, and once again highlighted a commitment to the poor and the oppressed. Jesus insisted that people not duplicate Rome’s oppressive rule in the way that they treated each other. His followers and many early Christians understood this message clearly–understood, as did the powerful in Rome, that it was a revolutionary message calling upon the faithful to reject the power of tyrants and embrace the power of love, which would ultimately be more forceful than anything Rome could deliver. Just as the message of Torah was tragically turned into its opposite by “the religious” and their establishment, so Christianity, taken over by Constantine, became its opposite, a system that provided justification for the powerful while ignoring or even actively subverting the needs of the poor and the powerless…

    These perversions of Judaism and Christianity took place in the name of the original vision, drawing on the texts and the justifications that could be found there because at one point those triumphalist texts had provided needed empowerment for the poor and the downtrodden, and had been a psychologically necessary buttress against despair.

    In the United States, the powerful have appropriated God and religion to justify imperial rule around the globe. They are not intent on using power to rectify the situation of the powerless. On the contrary, as their domestic moves make clear, they redistribute wealth upward from the poor to the rich. The global system of capital that they have created has had that same impact, increasing the suffering of the powerless while empowering a small class within each society to act as the guardian of the interests of Western capital in third-world countries.

    The Religious Right allies with and provides much of the ideological cover for this development. It allows the powerful to worship their own power and then, taking the work of their own hands, declare it the God to be worshipped by all. This is pure idolatry. It allows America, the most powerful and arrogant of all the arrogant and powerful nations that exist today, to identify itself in its own mind with the oppressed children of Israel and thus to imagine that its use of force is divinely sanctioned.

    It is long past time that we re-examine the prophets for what they have to teach us about Kingdom, Idolatry and chosenness.

    Sprucing Up

    8 comments

    I thought I would give the ole blog a makeover. What do you think so far?

    I’m hoping to get the “now reading” plug-in up and running but for some reason I can’t get it to add books. I’m stumped.  If only I knew somebody who knew their way around programming.
    Anyway give me your thoughts about the new design.

    Wherein, I attempt to answer my own questions.

    A couple of months ago I did a 10 part series on how I got to where I am spiritually. Today, I begin a series where I wrestle with where I am at currently.

    I will do it in the context of the questions I asked yesterday.  The posts in this series will not be static.  My views and positions are in a state of flux as I suss out what it means to be Christ-like.  But, they are my views and positions.  As always, I covet your thoughts.

    At what point do we, in the church, get truly serious about weighing all scripture through the person of Jesus Christ?

    In John 14:6 Jesus makes his bold pronouncement that he is “the way, and the truth, and the life.”

    I imagine that every preacher has a sermon that he can dust off at a moment’s notice on this passage.

    “Jesus is the way–there is no other path to salvation.”

    “Jesus is the truth–there is an objective standard to understanding what is true and right”

    But what about the life?  What does that mean for us?  I propose that it means much more than just a full and complete existence here on earth.  It is more than a joyful approach to day to day living.

    When I have preached this passage I have focused more on the abundant life idea and less on the ethical implications of the way Jesus has called us to live.

    But Jesus is not merely telling us here about some great blessing or earthly benefit to embracing Him as the Way and the Truth.  He is saying, unequivocally, that to arrive at a fuller knowledge of God we must live our lives the same way Jesus did.

    I think, too often, we look at “the life” in this passage as the gift that we can expect from accepting the first two rather than an admonition to live as an embodiment of “the way” and “the truth.” We think more about what Jesus wants to give us rather than what He calls us to give.
    To have the true zoe life we must filter our thoughts and actions through the Jesus filter.

    We can construct a legitimate argument for war if we rely solely upon OT passages but does it pass the filter of Jesus and the life that he lived?

    We can teach our children the need for self-esteem and the right we have to “stand up for ourselves” but does it pass the Jesus filter of meekness and turning the other cheek?

    We can justify having enemies because of various ways that we have been wronged but does it pass the Jesus filter of loving them?

    We can bog ourselves down in the minutia of scripture magnifying various proof-texts into tests of fellowship and righteousness but does that pass the Jesus filter of loving our neighbor as ourselves?

    To truly have “the life,” that abundant life that Jesus promises us, we have to accept the totality of what that life means. That means the ethical implications of the life Jesus lived.

    It means that we take up the basin and the towel and live servant lives.

    It means that we seek not to exalt ourselves but consider others better than we are.

    It means that we practice mercy, even when we don’t feel very merciful.

    It means that we never stop advocating for peace over and above “security.”

    It means that we be reconcilers seeking first to repair damaged relationships.

    It means that we develop greater hearts for the poor.

    It means that we value women and their roles in the kingdom.

    It means that we seek to minister at the margins of society.

    It means that our “borders” are not limited to states or nations but includes all of those for whom Jesus died.

    We must be intent on living our lives as Jesus did.  It is increasingly problematic to take rashly developed exegesis of OT passages to justify nation-building and embracing “chosen” status.

    The mere fact that God did something does not give us equal license to do the same. He is, after all, God.  And we are not.

    But we are called to be Christ-like.  And that means living “the life.”

    He is the final arbiter of how we are to live.

    This is rattling around in my head right now.  If you have the conclusive (or even a good guess) let me know.

    • At what point do we, in the church, get truly serious about weighing all scripture through the person of Jesus Christ? Isn’t He the resting place for all of our conclusions and approaches to living and loving?
    • Will we ever break away from our proclivity to proof-text our rationales for war, propagating poverty and elevating our spheres of concern over above the needs of those who fall outside of those spheres? God commanding war in the OT is not a good enough reason for me to blindly embrace armed conflict today.
    • What moral obligation do I have to reduce poverty and be a voice for the least of these?  How far-reaching is that?  How much does that affect what I buy, where I shop, etc?
    • Could it be that we have completely blown Romans 13 out of proportion and twisted it completely into an unrecognizable form from its original intent?
    • What does a true ethic of life consist of?  How can I be pro-life and accept the needless death of any individual?
    • When did faith get confused with certainty on every moral question?
    • If the greatest commandments are all that, shouldn’t we be focusing a whole lot more on what it means to love God and love people?
    • Can we lay aside our personal disgust on sins that particularly rankle us to have an open discussion about the true make-up of sinful behavior?
    • Have we so marginalized women in the church that they have no outlet for their gifts and talents? If so, when do we emerge from our patriarichal stone-age?
    • Is there a cure for the frustrations I feel? I’m not getting much sleep right now.

    Maybe you can see why I’ve steered more toward humor and such lately.  I have to get out of my head.

    Any thoughts?

    I find myself in an inexplicably bad mood today.  I feel frustrated, overwhelmed and drained. This series on “Redeeming Issues” is taking more out of me than I realized it would.

    I realize that I haven’t posted much of a substantive nature lately, opting more for humor and lame lists.  Tomorrow I will ask for your discussion on issues of poverty and the prosperity gospel.

    In the meantime, here is a list of things I can do without:

    1. Ties (whoever invented them and whoever convinced people that they are legitimate articles of clothing should both be exhumed and shot.)
    2. War
    3. Diapers (that little one of mine has to be importing extra poop to put in her Huggies when we aren’t looking.)
    4. Telephones (and their little mobile spawn)
    5. Turkey
    6. Christmas decorations in July
    7. Oprah’s fascination with Anderson Cooper (Overexposure alert)
    8. Our neighbor’s perfect lawn and the daily sight of him scrubbing his mailbox.
    9. Whining about the estate tax.
    10. Celebrity babies and the combining of names (I may just be ticked that Scacy or Trott never took off as common monikers for me and Tracy)
    11. Mayonnaise
    12. Fox News
    13. Teddy Stollard (the story ain’t real so I can go without hearing it ever again)
    14. The strict and utter reliance on anecdotal and/or hypothetical information to make a point.
    15. Hugh Jackman (This only makes sense if you watch “Scrubs”)
    16. Exclamation points!!!!
    17. Cooking and home improvement shows
    18. Any reference to Red States/Blue States
    19. Coming of Age TV shows (The O.C., I’m talking to you)
    20. Maisy (Don’t get me started on that alligator)
    21. Prescription advertisements (No, I didn’t realize I needed Levitra until now that I see those people smiling)
    22. Jack Johnson
    23. Muffin Tops (I mean, come on, I’m trying to take my family out for a Sunday lunch.  Please)
    24. Talk about the Bird Flu (Let’s just accept the inevitable: if it hits the states, we’re all dead.  But that should not affect ticket sales to Superman.)
    25. Any mention of my daughters ever having boyfriends
    26. Summer (Give me cold weather)
    27. Tracts
    28. Columnists, authors and talk-show hosts who spew hatred (I don’t need to name names do I?)
    29. Surcharges and hidden fees
    30. The entire self-help genre
    31. The prosperity gospel
    32. Yard work
    33. Setbacks in running
    34. Being awake before 7:30
    35. My love of habit
    36. Misguided moral outrage
    37. Phone questionnaires attached to receipts.  (Like I need the added guilt of knowing that if I don’t call and answer a few short questions then I keep my family from saving money the next time we eat at your establishment.  Let’s just cut out the middle-man.  I’ll tell you your customer service needs impovement, the fries aren’t hot enough, the high chair hasn’t been cleaned since the Hoover administration but you make an outstanding milkshake and you give me the 3% off of my order)
    38. Cleaning the Kitchen

    That was much harder then I thought it would be.  Maybe I’m not as cantankerous as I imagine I am.  But I do feel a lot better now.

    What about you, what can you do without?

    I stole this from Tracy, but I get to do 8 more.

    1. Jesus
    2. My darling wife, who can irritate me better than anyone but who I still want to spend all my time with.
    3. My amazing girls.  Chloe, Cassie and Shayla are my premiere source of joy.
    4. Arriving at the office first thing in the morning.
    5. Mazzio’s Chocolate Chip Pizza.
    6. My loving family (Mom, dad, this list is not in order.  I do love you more than chocolate chip pizza.)
    7. A good book (non-fiction, please)
    8. Scrubs
    9. The slow walk back to the car after a good run.
    10. The Arkansas Razorbacks.
    11. Michael McDermott’s music.
    12. Comments (it’s probably a little pathetic how much I love when people comment on this thing)
    13. My church family
    14. Target
    15. My iPod (though don’t get me started on iTunes.)
    16. Sojourners
    17. La Fiesta
    18. The fact that any vote I might have cast in the past cannot be held against me in a court of law (although those records are probably in an NSA database somewhere along with every book I have checked out of the library, every call I have made and the fact that I had a crush on my 5th grade teacher.)
    19. Sleeping in (I think. It’s been so long)
    20. My blog community
    21. That my family and church allows me to be me (and still seems to like me anyway)
    22. TV
    23. Mere Discipleship
    24. Matt Nathanson’s music
    25. Trips to the library (although our librarians are emotionless meanies)
    26. My new (used) Hyundai
    27. Cricklers
    28. The outlet that I have through this blog
    29. Getting the mail
    30. That you can completely overcome how much of a dork you were in high school.  Yes, I’m talking about you.  I was cool.
    31. Football, the greatest sport.
    32. The extra income of mystery shopping
    33. Chocolate
    34. Preaching and teaching
    35. Cold weather
    36. Eating out
    37. The fact that God knows how inconsistent and imperfect I am yet loves and forgives me anyway.
    38. My life

    On Spam

    1 comment

    When I had a typepad account I never received comment spam.  WordPress isn’t quite as Fort Knox-ian in it’s faux-ham security.

    As my readership has grown in the last few months to around 450 hits a day, I’ve seen a growth in pseudo-pork.

    A couple of weeks ago I installed Akismet, a bogus beef filter.  It seems they have a top-notch system of catching mythical meat.  The influx of tricky turkey has grown exponentially since then.  So, is my spam filter actually going out and courting this stuff?

    Anyway, much of the spam that it is catching is well-versed at crafting comments that look like it might fit into the flow of a conversation.  I’m enjoying reading them and trying to understand what that conversation might be.

    Here’s a sampling of actual spam comments I have received lately:

    • An exhaustive knowledge of the life and times of Douglas “Tin Legs” Bader, English WWII fighter ace. (This piece of spam makes light of Bader who fought despite having both legs amputated. Spam is no respecter of persons.)
    • **Not to be confused with the town of Normal, Illinois. Anyone know anyone from there? (Actually, no I don’t although I do know that McLean Stevenson is from Normal.  And the first Steak ‘n Shake was there.)
    • ‘Grandma, when is the world going to end?’  (Since this is a spam for Cephalexin I believe the correct answer is “The world is not going to end, it just feels like it does because it burns when you urinate.”)
    • “William Safire has just been picked on by a blog with a name that keeps changing. Not too harshly, though. The comment is William Safire, you annoy me.” (Don’t worry, Mr. Safire.  As you know they are just ‘nattering nabobs of negativity.’)
    • I’d feel clever if it wasn’t for the fact that every single person in the country who isn’t in the Tory party took the same view. (You crazy Brits! Sure, I’ll click the link and play party poker with you.)
    • He sits at his chair, one of those faggy ball chairs, crosses his legs and turns toward his Macintosh. “Come, lovely. Let me show you how to open an email.” (Now, I’m really interested in what happens next.  I’m disappointed the clicking the link only finds me bargain prices for depakote.)
    • i have been writing up a fierce storm to the echoing applause of silent rejections (at least send a note, people). and i have been making leaps and bounds in therapy. (People might be more willing to respond when you finish the Prilosec treatment you’re pushing, honey.)
    • Louise of course. Thelma is much too tragic. (I’d chime in here, but I really wish I knew what the question was.  I also can’t remember who played Louise.  Was it Sarandon or Davis? Because that would play a much greater factor in my decision than which character was the most tragic.)
    • Another reason to love Senegal is because of the music they produce there. (Noted.)

    There you have it.  The vast majority of these are for prescription pills such as Oxycontin and Klonopin.  Could it be that we are all so heavily medicated that eventually spam will actually start working because we will be so sedated that we will lose the ability of discernment?

    It’s just a question. To quote one of my commenters, “Right, that’ll do for now. I’m off to see Ritmos da Cidade and Grupo Sambando with the Drumming Club.”

    You got any interesting spam lately?

    Halifax, Nova Scotia was founded in 1749.

    New Hampshire becomes the ninth state in 1788.

    Lou Gehrig retires in 1939.

    Three civil rights workers are murdered in Neshoba Country, Mississippi in 1964.  (See movie Mississippi Burning.)

    I am born in 1968.  That makes me 38 today.

    Those sharing my birthday include:

    Jean-Paul Sartre (1905)

    Lalo Schifrin (1932) Note: he has my favorite album title of all time: There’s a whole Lalo Schifrin Going On

    Ray Davies (1944) Brought us Lola, not Lalo.

    All in all, it’s a pretty boring day in world history.

    But, it’s my birthday none-the-less.

    I still don’t think I look 38.

    I’ll repent for this tomorrow, but I needed the stress relief of this.  Here are the season finales of some kids shows.  Understand, this stuff is on way too much at my house.

    Dora the Explorer–Dora, finally realizing the freedom she has with such permissive parents takes up with a travelling Zydeco-band, playing tambourine in seedy night-clubs across Mexico.  In a startling move to finance her growing Oxycontin addiction, she sells Boots to a private collector of exotic pets.  Swiper is despondent.

    The Doodlebops–The NSA, fearing that Moe is doing more than just hiding himself, raid their home carting them all off to Guantanamo Bay. After days of sleep-deprivation, forced starvation, and other types of torture, Rooney finally cracks and shares the real reason that Moe insists upon pulling that rope.  In a chilling final scene, Bus Driver Bob is revealed as being a secret operative for an extremist Islamic sect.

    LazyTown–Sportacus and Robby Rotten grapple with their hidden feelings for one another.  This unexpected revelation sends Stephanie into a downward spiral of gorging herself on Ho-Hos and Starbucks Frappucino’s. She balloons to 425 pounds before Pixel rigs up a LAP-BAND procedure in his tree-house.

    Max and Ruby–Ruby finally comes clean with Max about what really happened to their parents.  The brutal truth is more than Max can handle, sending him on a rampage that results in a crossover episode with the Teletubbies.  In the most startling twist of the season, before Tinky Winky can act and stop Max’s carnage, Dipsy is cut down in the prime of life.

    Spongebob Squarepants–The idyllic calm of Bikini Bottom is shattered when Squidward receives word that Plankton has received access to biological weapons.  In a heart-pounding race against time, Spongebob has 24 hours to find Plankton, disarm the weapons and save Patrick from the cross-hairs of an evil cabal that is secretly funding the Krusty Krab.

    Moving On

    13 comments

    My sermon was not recorded yesterday.  It really bums me because I thought it was a timely treatment of humanity that led into our discussion of stem cell research last night.

    I was incredibly pleased with my congregations handling of the discussion last night.  They appeared to take a much more scientific, pro-technology stance than I anticipated.  They quickly seized on the emptiness of the “playing God” critique, the chasm between “potential human” and “actual human,” and the responsibility we have to those who are with us now.
    May our ethics have the time necessary to catch up with our technology.

    All of you who participated in the discussion were acknowledge at the beginning.

    My next subject is Intelligent Design: or why we are so bent on being at war with science.

    Give me your thoughts on this.  What do you think about the intelligent design debate? Why do we bump heads with science so regularly? How do we overcome that?