For me, the topic of reconciliation involves many questions:
1. Does Hell exist?
2. If so, is it eternal?
3. What, exactly, would condemn one to hell?
4. How do we reconcile a loving and compassionate Parent condemning a child to everlasting torment without hope of “rehabilitation?”
5. Do we miss something by focusing salvation in a purely legal context?
6. Who is Anselm and why is he saying all these terrible things about me?
7. How do we reconcile passages that direct us to forgive 7X70 and then excuse God from the same standard?
8. Do we really believe that God is a God of love? And how is that reconciled with our cries for justice? If we believe that 85% or more of people living today will suffer forever and ever and ever how do we preach a loving God?
9. Is it possible to elevate our “free will” to a place of idolatry?
10. Can there be a different view that incorporates God’s Sovereignty, man’s free will and God’s tender and compassionate love that continues to hold a high regard for scripture?
11. What did the early church believe?
12. If hell is an eternal reality why am I not more serious about it?
13. Can people hold varying views and remain in fellowship?
These are just a few of the questions that I have grappled (and still!) with over the last few months. Ultimately, I believe that there is a more fleshed-out, nuanced understanding of the matter of God’s love (which justice is a part of, not a separate reality) that holds out far more hope than I ever realized.
It goes beyond the Augustinian notion of hell and posits God as the source of our hope. A hope that goes beyond eternal torment.
I know that these are difficult questions and I intend them to be. I’ve stopped and started this series many times in my head because I know the potential volatility of the subject matter might even outstrip that of non-violence.
But I know the participants in this community and we can wrestle with these questions in the spirit of brotherhood. Let’s do that.
What are your thoughts on these initial questions? What would you add to that?
Here is something to chew on as well from Thomas Allin:
It is wholly inconceivable that the definite plan of an Almighty
Being should end in failure—that this should be the
result of the agony of the eternal Son. God has, in the face
of angels and of men, before the universe and its gaze of
wonder, entered Himself into the arena, become Himself a
combatant, has wrestled with the foe, and has been defeated.
I can bring myself to imagine those, who reject the
Deity of Christ, as believing in His defeat; but it is passing
strange that those who believe Him to be “very God Almighty,”
are loudest in asserting His failure.



