<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott Freeman &#187; Oscar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottfreeman.info/category/oscar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottfreeman.info</link>
	<description>The Best Thoughts in Life are Free</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Academy Award Predictions</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2009/02/19/2008-academy-award-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2009/02/19/2008-academy-award-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academy awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sunday is the big night. As an Oscar enthusiast I anxiously await this night all year long. Unfortunately, I feel that there have been several major missteps this year in putting together the ceremony so my enthusiasm has been dampened a bit. Hugh Jackman? Seriously? But it is always about the movies first and foremost. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunday is the big night.  As an Oscar enthusiast I anxiously await this night all year long.  Unfortunately, I feel that there have been several major missteps this year in putting together the ceremony so my enthusiasm has been dampened a bit.  Hugh Jackman? Seriously?<br />
But it is always about the movies first and foremost.  And there are some stellar films and performances vying for recognition this year.</p>
<p>Due to time constraints I can&#8217;t do a full breakdown this year but I will post a bit of analysis.  One thing is true: whenever you start hearing someone say that a film is a lock is when you really need to start wondering how true that is.</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture</strong></p>
<p>Will Win&#8211;<strong>Slumdog Millionaire</strong>:  This is the biggest lock to win Best Picture since Brokeback Mountain.  The only problem is that Brokeback did not win.  The main difference here is that Slumdog peaked at just the right time whereas Brokeback had been the frontrunner for months and peaked way too early leading to the ubiquitous Oscar backlash.<br />
Could Upset&#8211;Anything but <strong>Frost/Nixon</strong>.  The Reader is a captivating tale and has the Weinstein PR machine behind it.  My gut is that it peaked too late, however.  <strong>Benjamin Button</strong> could move in here but overall the reception was somewhat reserved.  <strong>Milk</strong> is a fabulous film and would not be just a perceived makeup for Brokeback but could win on its own merits.<br />
Should Win&#8211;Slumdog Millionaire.  As much as I like each of the other nominees, this is the best picture of the year.</p>
<p>Best Actor<br />
Will Win&#8211;This could go either way between <strong>Sean Penn</strong> and <strong>Mickey Rourke</strong>.  I&#8217;m going to go with Penn for bringing Harvey Milk to life.<br />
Could Upset&#8211;I guess there is a scenario where <strong>Brad Pitt</strong> could sneak in if Penn and Rourke split votes but I don&#8217;t see that happening.  A better choice would be <strong>Frank Langella</strong> for actually making Richard Nixon a sympathetic character.  That is the perfomance that will be remembered in retrospect.<br />
Should Win&#8211;Penn has won before and his role is more about the character than the performance.  <strong>Rourke </strong>should be honored for such a stunning comeback.  </p>
<p>Best Actress<br />
Will Win&#8211;I&#8217;ve heard talk that Meryl Streep is making a tremendous surge to taking home another trophy after a long hiatus.  However, this statue must belong to <strong>Kate Winslet</strong> for her indelible performance of a woman who is complex, layered and mysterious.  It is her turn.<br />
Could Upset&#8211;If <strong>Streep </strong>wins it is a huge upset in my book.<br />
Should Win&#8211;Winslet</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor<br />
Will Win&#8211;<strong>Heath Ledger</strong>, although this could be the upset of the night.  This statue was practically handed to him over a year ago when he died.  The raw emotion of that passing has now subsided and Oscar voters hate being told who to vote for.  With that said, he deserves the trophy based upon the merits of his performance.  A win here after a huge snub for The Dark Knight is important.<br />
Could Upset&#8211;<strong>Robert Downey, Jr</strong>. turned in an impeccable performance.<br />
Should Win&#8211;Ledger</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actress<br />
Will Win&#8211;I view this as the most wide open contest of the night.  In theory the two Doubt performances should cancel each other out.  However, who would not love to see an <strong>Amy Adams</strong> victory?  My heart says <strong>Tomei </strong>wins and removes all doubt about her legitimacy as an Oscar winner but I am afraid that <strong>Penelope Cruz</strong> wins for her performance in the insipid Vicky Cristina Barcelona.  Ugh.</p>
<p>Best Director&#8211;<strong>Danny Boyle</strong><br />
Best Original Screenplay&#8211;<strong>Dustin Lance Black</strong><br />
Best Adapted Screenplay&#8211;<strong>Simon Beaufoy</strong></p>
<p>Best Song&#8211;Bruce Springsteen&#8217;s omission makes this category absolutely worthless. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2009/02/19/2008-academy-award-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Oscar Predictions</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2009/01/21/2008-oscar-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2009/01/21/2008-oscar-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscar predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that we have that inauguration/hope stuff behind us we can turn our attention to what is truly important: The Academy Awards. The nominations will be unveiled tomorrow morning (7:30 Central Time) and, as usual, I offer my predictions for the major awards. I have done very well so far in seeing the major players. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we have that inauguration/hope stuff behind us we can turn our attention to what is truly important: The Academy Awards.<br />
The nominations will be unveiled tomorrow morning (7:30 Central Time) and, as usual, I offer my predictions for the major awards.<br />
I have done very well so far in seeing the major players.  As a matter of fact I have seen 4 of the 5 that I think will get a Best Picture nod.  But, as often is the case with the Academy, the nominations are anything but predictable.</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture</strong><br />
Slumdog Millionaire<br />
Milk<br />
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button<br />
The Dark Knight<br />
Frost/Nixon</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: This are ranked in order of my confidence in their nomination.  The first three, in my estimation, are locks (although I have not seen <em>Button</em> yet).  Dark Knight is not a lock but I think it gets in, not only because it is worthy but because the Academy needs it to be in.  Frost/Nixon is a stellar film and worthy of inclusion but there are 2-3 pics that could sneak in here: <strong>Revolutionary Road</strong> and <strong>The Reader</strong> are the two most likely.  If this is the year of Kate Winslet, then that could happen.  Despite all of the <strong>Wall-E</strong> talk I don&#8217;t think it makes the cut.  Same with <strong>The Wrestler</strong>.  That gets Mickey Rourke a nom but not enough to propel the film.  And <strong>Gran Torino</strong> is good but not a best picture.  Although it is foolish to ever count out Eastwood.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actor</strong><br />
Sean Penn (Milk)<br />
Mickey Rourke (The Wrestler)<br />
Frank Langella (Frost/Nixon)<br />
Clint Eastwood (Gran Torino)<br />
Brad Pitt (Benjamin Button)</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: This is a two horse race at this point between Penn (who was masterful as Milk) and Rourke.  More will be known as we follow the arc between nominations and presentation but it is down to these two guys.  I feel pretty good about this group but can&#8217;t completely count out Leonardo Dicaprio (Revolutionary Road) or Richard Jenkins (The Visitor).  I don&#8217;t think <strong>Colin Farrel&#8217;s</strong> GG win for In Bruges is enough.  </p>
<p><strong>Best Actress</strong><br />
Kate Winslet (Revolutionary Road)<br />
Meryl Streep (Doubt)<br />
Anne Hathaway (Rachel Getting Married)<br />
Angelina Jolie (Changeling)<br />
Melissa Leo (Frozen River)</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Winslet gets two noms this year and hopefully this is the year she finally goes home with a statue.  I hope this is Hathaway&#8217;s award, however.  Streep is always a no-brainer and Jolie has garnered raves for a movie that seemed to be split among critics.  Leo is the mystery here.  I don&#8217;t know much about her or the movie but she seems to be getting a great deal of buzz.  And that is the name of the game.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong><br />
Heath Ledger (Dark Knight)<br />
Josh Brolin (Milk)<br />
Dev Patel (Slumdog Millionaire)<br />
Robert Downey, Jr. (Tropic Thunder)<br />
Phillip Seymour Hoffman (Doubt)</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: Ledger and Brolin are locks.  Patel benefits by a campaign for support rather than lead.  And Downey deserves a nod.  I would like to see Tom Cruise garner a nomination for his performance in Tropic as well but I don&#8217;t see it happening.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong><br />
Kate Winslet (The Reader)<br />
Marisa Tomei (The Wrestler)<br />
Amy Adams (Doubt)<br />
Penelope Cruz (Vicki Christina Barcelona)<br />
Frieda Pinto (Slumdog Millionaire)</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: This category is perennially hard for me to pin down.  After Winslet, who should win, it is all a crap shoot.  However, I would love to see <strong>Rosemary DeWitt</strong> be recognized for Rachel. </p>
<p><strong>Best Director</strong><br />
Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionaire)<br />
David Fincher (Benjamin Button)<br />
Christopher Nolan (Dark Knight)<br />
Gus Van Sant (Milk)<br />
Clint Eastwood (Gran Torino)</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong>: I&#8217;m going with Eastwood edging out Ron Howard because it is Clint Eastwood and the Academy loves him and Director and Picture seldom line up 5 for 5.</p>
<p>We shall see how I do tomorrow.  Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2009/01/21/2008-oscar-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Predictions</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/02/23/oscar-predictions-2/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/02/23/oscar-predictions-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/2007/02/23/oscar-predictions-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m an Academy Award wonk and have a pretty good track record of picking the winners each year. However, this year is the most wide-open field since 1995. There are scenarios where all five best picture nominees could walk away with the top prize. If you are interested in an unpredictable night at the Oscars, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an Academy Award wonk and have a pretty good track record of picking the winners each year.  However, this year is the most wide-open field since 1995.  There are scenarios where all five best picture nominees could walk away with the top prize.<br />
If you are interested in an unpredictable night at the Oscars, this is the one.  I&#8217;ll try to take my best stab at the top categories but I&#8217;m not expecting to be overly successful.</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture</strong></p>
<p><strong>Will Win</strong>&#8211;Again, I think a case can be made for all of these movies.  The best I can do is a process of elimination as none of these truly stand out above the others.  The Queen has a shot because of its across the board excellence and its multiple nominations.  Little Miss Sunshine has great love from the acting block but it&#8217;s lack of a directing nom could be a detriment.  Letters From Iwo Jima is making a late surge and it has the Eastwood cachet.  Babel is an outstanding film that delivered some of the most intense scenes of the year.  But ultimately I think there will finally be a much belated breakthrough for Scorcese and <strong>The Departed</strong> will be swept along with that tide.<br />
Should Win&#8211;<strong>Babel </strong>is the one movie that has stuck with me after seeing it.  The message of fractured communication in the midst of heartache and struggle is compelling.</p>
<p>Best Actor<br />
Will Win&#8211;Although there seems to be a lot of sentiment for Peter O&#8217;Toole I have to give the nod to <strong>Forrest Whitaker</strong> for his stirring depiction of Idi Amin.  Besides O&#8217;Toole just received an honorary award.<br />
Should Win&#8211;It&#8217;s hard to go against those two luminaries for their performances but no actor sucked me in with a performance this year better than <strong>Leonardo DiCaprio</strong>.  And he did it twice.</p>
<p>Best Actress<br />
<strong>Will Win</strong>&#8211;Although Oscar is famed for its backlash, and <strong>Helen Mirren</strong> has led from the outset scooping up every award along the way, nothing stands in her way this year.<br />
Should Win&#8211;<strong>Mirren</strong></p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor<br />
Will Win&#8211;It&#8217;s a horse race between Arkin and Murphy but I think old school gives <strong>Alan Arkin</strong> the trophy.<br />
Should Win&#8211;It&#8217;s <strong>Eddie Murphy</strong> with a career defining role that should win the prize.  A lot of talk has been about how Norbit may hurt his chances.  But he shouldn&#8217;t be penalized for being Eddie Murphy.  He should be awarded for how staggering this departure was.</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actress<br />
Will Win&#8211;<strong>Jennifer Hudson</strong> for dominating every scene she was in in Dreamgirls.<br />
Should Win&#8211;<strong>Hudson</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Director</strong><br />
Will Win-It&#8217;s finally <strong>Marty</strong>&#8216;s year.  But Eastwood is looking over his shoulder and could be the spoiler yet again.<br />
Should Win&#8211;<strong>Martin Scorcese</strong>.  If there is anyone due, it&#8217;s him.  </p>
<p>Other Thoughts:<br />
Children of Men should snatch up cinematography.  It is the most beautifully shot movie of the year.<br />
Babel will, inexplicably, win editing.  It&#8217;s a great film but, come on, they couldn&#8217;t have trimmed 10 minutes off of it.<br />
I&#8217;d love to see Borat win screenplay, but it won&#8217;t happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/02/23/oscar-predictions-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Tuesday: Best Picture Snubs 1968&#8211;2005</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/30/top-10-tuesday-best-picture-snubs-1968-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/30/top-10-tuesday-best-picture-snubs-1968-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10s]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/30/top-10-tuesday-best-picture-snubs-1968-2005/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year there is some backlash when it comes to the glaring omissions in the Academy Award nominations. This year Dreamgirls was a virtual shoo-in for a best picture nom, but was beaten out by Letters From Iwo Jima. I can&#8217;t say whether or not this was a mistake because I haven&#8217;t seen all of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year there is some backlash when it comes to the glaring omissions in the Academy Award nominations.  This year Dreamgirls was a virtual shoo-in for a best picture nom, but was beaten out by Letters From Iwo Jima.  I can&#8217;t say whether or not this was a mistake because I haven&#8217;t seen all of the nominees yet.<br />
However, there are many years where I can give an informed opinion about Best Picture mistakes.   In two parts I will give the greatest snubs in Best Picture history.  In part one I will give the mistakes made during my lifetime.  Next week I&#8217;ll look at the rest of Oscar history.<br />
Some understanding for this list: There are years where there are movies that I would have like to have seen nominated but I can&#8217;t find a movie that I would have knocked off the list.  For example, in 1974, neither Alice Doesn&#8217;t Live Here Anymore nor Monty Python and the Holy Grail were nominated.  But I cannot make a valid argument that any of the nominees that year should not have been nominated: Chinatown, The Conversation, Lenny, The Towering Inferno, or The Godfather, Part 2.  Hence, those movies are not on my list.<br />
In addition, I had to have seen both the movie I propose to be on the list and the movie to be removed.</p>
<p>10. <strong>The Wild Bunch (1969)</strong>  I know I run a major risk of being overly hard on musicals, but I believe that the same general rule applies here as do the rules Oscar puts on comedies: if it is going to be nominated, it has to raise the bar.  <strong>Hello, Dolly</strong> did not raise the bar but effectively put an end to the love affair the Academy had with musicals during the 60s.  The Wild Bunch redefined action movies with its use of slow motion and became an ironically touching portrait of growing older.</p>
<p>9. <strong>Little Big Man (1970)</strong>&#8211;If your idea of a great movie-going experience is to choke on saccharine as your emotions are shamelessly manipulated then you will defend the omission of the classic western in favor of the treacly <strong>Love Story</strong>.  But you will be wrong.  And love DOES mean you have to say sorry.  Sorry for producing this schlock.</p>
<p>8. <strong>Blade Runner (1982)</strong>&#8211;Sure, I love the thought of Dustin Hoffman (<strong>Tootsie</strong>) in a dress as much as the next guy, but there is no way the dystopian genius of Ridley Scott&#8217;s depiction of the near future is outpaced by yet another celebrity trolling for cheap laughs.  In light of all the movies that followed that play on this gimmick, there should have been a serious discussion on whether or not Hoffman would be allowed to act again rather than honor it with a best picture nom.</p>
<p>7. <strong>Brazil (1985)</strong>&#8211;Terry Gilliam&#8217;s post-apocalyptic satire may well be one of the most beautifully crafted movies of our lifetime.  The fact that it can be categorized as science fiction and a comedy shows the deftness of Gilliam&#8217;s hand.  Instead, the Academy opted for tedium and nominated <strong>The Kiss of The Spider Woman</strong>.  I would say more about this convoluted mess but I struggled making it through.</p>
<p>6. <strong>Miller&#8217;s Crossing (1990)</strong>&#8211;The Coen brothers at their all-time best failed to grab a Single nomination.  Rather than reward one of the grittiest film noirs of our time, the academy instead opted to reward us with the syrup double feature of <strong>Awakenings </strong>and <strong>Ghost</strong>.  Any Academy member that opted over those two hour servings of molasses over the complex twist of Miller&#8217;s should have their membership revoked.  No one makes Miller sit in a corner.</p>
<p>5. <strong>The Usual Suspects (1995)</strong>&#8211;OK, I have a nomination form in front of me.  I can vote for one of the defining movies of the 90s that popularized twist endings or a movie about a talking pig.  No contest.  Give me <strong>Babe</strong>. Before I get flamed by the Moms of Preschoolers, understand this: Keyser Soze would have roasted Babe for breakfast.</p>
<p>4. <strong>Truman Show (1998)</strong>&#8211;I think the reason this movie failed to be acknowledged was because nobody realized how prescient this movie truly was.  In our &#8220;reality-tv&#8221; culture, Truman is all too indicting.  At the time we had no full way of knowing how accurate it was.  Therefore, the Academy chose to award Terrance Malick&#8217;s return to movie-making with his messy snoozer <strong>The Thin Red Line</strong>.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Almost Famous (2000)</strong>&#8211;I don&#8217;t like to watch movies repeatedly.  But if you put Cameron Crowe&#8217;s masterful loose autobiography on in front of me, I&#8217;ll be glued to the screen.  This movie hits on all cylinders.  <strong>Chocolat does not</strong>.  This was during the long streak of the Weinstein brothers buying nominations.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Memento (2001)</strong>&#8211;If you have seen this mind-bender then you obviously share my outrage that this movie received no love at award time.  If I remind you that it was shut out by the likes of <strong>Gosford Park</strong> and <strong>Moulin Rouge</strong> then you will reconsider ever watching movies again.</p>
<p>1. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)&#8211;My favorite movie of the year was overlooked by the underwhelming <strong>Ray </strong>and the manipulative <strong>Finding Neverland</strong>.  Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/30/top-10-tuesday-best-picture-snubs-1968-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Tuesday: Biggest Best Picture Mistakes</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/23/top-10-tuesday-biggest-best-picture-mistakes/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/23/top-10-tuesday-biggest-best-picture-mistakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/23/top-10-tuesday-biggest-best-picture-mistakes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Oscar, but he is an imperfect beast. Frankly, he often makes the wrong call. This is my list for the 10 biggest mistakes they have made through the years in handing out the statuette for picture: 10. Titanic over L.A. Confidential (1997)&#8211;Honestly, I got caught up in the hoopla just like everybody else. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Oscar, but he is an imperfect beast.  Frankly, he often makes the wrong call.  This is my list for the 10 biggest mistakes they have made through the years in handing out the statuette for picture:</p>
<p>10. <strong>Titanic over L.A. Confidential (1997)</strong>&#8211;Honestly, I got caught up in the hoopla just like everybody else.  The movie that could have sank, instead floated on an Oscar tidal wave.  But it was the adaptation of James Ellroy&#8217;s novel that stands the test of time.  It is deeply reminiscent of the hard-boiled detective stories of yesteryear, full of layers of intrigue and mystery.  </p>
<p>9. <strong>Dances With Wolves over Goodfellas (1990)</strong>&#8211;The Academy&#8217;s dismissal of Scorcese&#8217;s work has been going on for almost three full decades.  There is no more glaring oversight than this one.  Sure, this was the first of Costner&#8217;s overblown ego projects and we didn&#8217;t fully realize where that would end up.  But come on.  If you have both DVD&#8217;s in your hands right now, which one are you putting in?  I thought so.</p>
<p>8. <strong>Lawrence of Arabia over To Kill A Mockingbird (1962)</strong>&#8211;Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Lawrence is a great film but it has none of the epochal virtue of Mockingbird.  The adaptation of Harper Lee&#8217;s novel signified the beginning of a seismic shift in American culture.</p>
<p>7. <strong>Gladiator over Traffic (2000)</strong>&#8211;Sure, Crowe&#8217;s Maximus brings out the inner warrior in each of us.  I get that.  But Soderburgh weaves a complicated and intricate web of seemingly unrelated stories on the drug war in America that sends the viewer reeling.  Seeking dialogue over resolution this is one of the important films of the 21st century.  Oscar missed that.</p>
<p>6. <strong>Going My Way over Double Indemnity (1944)</strong>&#8211;Bing Crosby as a priest? No thanks.  The definitive film noir? Yes, please.  </p>
<p>5. <strong>Driving Miss Daisy over every other nominated picture</strong> (1989)  This year brought us the following nominees: Born on the Fourth of July, Dead Poets Society, Field of Dreams and My Left Foot.  There is no defense or excuse for this bone-headed of a pick.  It&#8217;s the academy&#8217;s version of the BCS.</p>
<p>4. <strong>All About Eve over Sunset Boulevard (1950)</strong>&#8211;Both movies explore the theme of aging stars.  Bette Davis and, especially, Anne Baxter are phenomenal in Eve.  However, it is Gloria Swanson&#8217;s  frightening, yet moving, portrayal of Norma Desmond that has become a cinematic touchstone.</p>
<p>3. <strong>A Beautiful Mind over Lord of the Rings (2001)</strong>&#8211;How many people did Russell Crowe have to threaten to throw a telephone at to score this upset? Peter Jackson created one of the most amazing visual feasts in cinematic history with a story that many thought was unfilmable.  Sure, he was rewarded for the first entry, but he lost here to a joke of a movie.</p>
<p>2. <strong>How Green Was My Valley over Citizen Kane (1941)</strong>&#8211;Sure, Orson Welles had ticked off too many powerful people in the making of this film.  And, granted, the Academy made many missteps during the World War 2 years.  But this is one of the greatest crimes in its history.  I&#8217;m not usually given to the build-up of hype over Kane and its overblown melodrama.  But it is one of the greatest films ever made.  How Green Was My Valley was not.</p>
<p>1. <strong>Forrest Gump over The Shawshank Redemption (1994)</strong>&#8211;Gump, and Hank&#8217;s cloying portrayal, make me want to hurl myself under a bus.  The fact that this insufferable 2 and a half hour mess of a film beat out one of the true great depictions of redemption ever captured on celluloid is the greatest misstep in the Academy&#8217;s history.  Treacle, I have met thee, and thy name is Forrest Gump.</p>
<p>Your thoughts or suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/23/top-10-tuesday-biggest-best-picture-mistakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predicting the Oscar Nominations</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/22/predicting-the-oscar-nominations/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/22/predicting-the-oscar-nominations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/22/predicting-the-oscar-nominations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call me a nerd, but I am an Academy Award buff. I&#8217;ve seen every best picture and actor winner. Over the last 10 years or so I&#8217;ve seen every best picture nominated film and 90% of the acting nominees. Tomorrow morning the Academy will announce their nominations for the 79th Academy Awards. Here is the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me a nerd, but I am an Academy Award buff.  I&#8217;ve seen every best picture and actor winner.  Over the last 10 years or so I&#8217;ve seen every best picture nominated film and 90% of the acting nominees.<br />
Tomorrow morning the Academy will announce their nominations for the 79th Academy Awards.  Here is the way I&#8217;m predicting it will go:</p>
<p><strong>Best Picture</strong>&#8211;There are three absolute locks in this category.  One almost lock.  And one movie with a head of steam coming into the announcement.<br />
<strong>Babel</strong>&#8211;Lock<br />
<strong>Dreamgirls</strong>&#8211;Lock<br />
<strong>The Departed</strong>&#8211;Lock<br />
<strong>The Queen</strong>&#8211;Almost a lock<br />
<strong>Little Miss Sunshine</strong>&#8211;Gaining ground fast and at this point is a dark horse to win it all.</p>
<p>Analysis&#8211;<strong>The Queen</strong> seems to have slowed a bit, although it is a fantastic film and I think it still will make it through.  People are beginning to acknowledge <strong>Sunshine </strong>for being one of the best movies of the year and I think it gets through.  There are still a few movies that are hanging around that could pull a stunner.  They are:<br />
&#8211;<strong>Children of Men</strong>:  The problem with this film is that it began to get the rave reviews and the push too late in the game.  If the nominations were a month from now, it&#8217;s chances would be better.<br />
&#8211;<strong>United 93</strong>: Critics love it, naming it the best picture in 9 different circles.  But, divorced from the emotions of those events, it&#8217;s not a great film.<br />
&#8211;<strong>Letters from  Iwo Jima</strong>: The Academy loves Clint Eastwood.  But this time I think he has to settle for just a Director nod.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actor</strong>&#8211;This is shaping up to be a great year for African American actors.  As it shapes up right now, they could pull out three of the four trophies this year.  And after the two locks this field gets rather shaky. Here is my best guess:<br />
<strong>Forest Whitaker in Last King of Scotland</strong>&#8211;Lock<br />
<strong>Will Smith in Pursuit of Happyness</strong>&#8211;Lock<br />
<strong>Peter O&#8217;Toole in Venus</strong>&#8211;Oft nominated but never a winner.  And he won&#8217;t win this year.  But look for him to haul in #8.<br />
<strong>Leonardo DiCaprio</strong>&#8211;Two stellar performances. The question is which movie garners the nom.  I think it will be for <strong>Blood Diamond</strong> since his role in <strong>The Departed</strong> is being pushed for supporting.  If so, I think Leo will be twice rewarded this year.<br />
<strong>Sacha Baron Cohen in Borat</strong>&#8211;Golden Globe win proves that this performance is being taken seriously.  It&#8217;s that good.<br />
Note&#8211;Look for Ryan Gosling to sneak in here if Leo splits his vote.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actress</strong>&#8211;For the first time in years this category has more weight than the Actor field.<br />
<strong>Helen Mirren in The Queen</strong>&#8211;Lock.  She has won EVERY award for her incredible performance.  Time to start dreading the Oscar backlash.<br />
<strong>Meryl Streep in The Devil Wears Prada</strong>&#8211;Lock, but isn&#8217;t she always?<br />
<strong>Judi Dench in Notes On a Scandal</strong>&#8211;Lock, but isn&#8217;t she always?<br />
<strong>Kate Winslet in Little Children</strong>&#8211;Her fifth! nomination.  The next, or current, Meryl Streep.<br />
<strong>Penelope Cruz in Volver</strong>&#8211;I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m writing this.</p>
<p><strong>Supporting Actor</strong>&#8211;Great performances, with one clear front-runner. And that is:<br />
<strong>Eddie Murphy in Dreamgirls</strong>&#8211;Eddie was a revelation in this film.  Tremendous.<br />
<strong>Djimon Honsou in Blood Diamond</strong>&#8211;This is one of my favorite performances of the year.  His love for his son will preach.<br />
<strong>Alan Arkin in Little Miss Sunshine</strong>&#8211;A career topping performance.<br />
<strong>Jackie Earl Haley in Little Children</strong>&#8211;Kelly Leak is back.<br />
<strong>Brad Pitt in Babel</strong>&#8211;I&#8217;m going for a long shot here. It&#8217;s Pitt&#8217;s time knocking out contenders like Nicholson and Wahlberg. </p>
<p><strong>Supporting Actress</strong>&#8211;I&#8217;m reaching here because I haven&#8217;t seen as many films with legitimate contenders in this field.  I&#8217;ll start with what I think should happen:<br />
<strong>Jennifer Hudson in Dreamgirls</strong>&#8211;WOW.  This is a lock.  And with Whitaker and Murphy this is three African American frontrunners.  A first.<br />
<strong>Abigail Breslin in Little Miss Sunshine</strong>&#8211;Give her the nod.  To upstage Steve Carrell, Greg Kinnear and Toni Collette takes some chops.<br />
<strong>Cate Blanchett in Notes On a Scandal<br />
Adriana Barraza or Rinko Kikuchi in Babel</strong>&#8211;But not both.<br />
<strong>Emma Thompson in Stranger Than Fiction</strong>&#8211;I&#8217;m afraid this becomes a rubber stamp here rather than giving it to who truly earned a nom: <strong>Emily Blunt in The Devil Wears Prada</strong></p>
<p><strong>Best Director</strong>&#8211;I am hoping against hope that Eastwood in not nominated here, because it is LONG past time that Scorcese is honored.  He is the greatest living director to have not won.  He&#8217;s way past due.<br />
<strong>Martin Scorcese for The Departed</strong><br />
<strong>Bill Condon for Dreamgirls</strong><br />
<strong>Alejandro González Iñárritu for Babel</strong><br />
<strong>Clint Eastwood for Letters From Iwo Jima</strong><br />
<strong>Steven Frears for The Queen</strong><br />
Note: We could see the Academy acknowledge United 93 here with a nod for Paul Greengrass</p>
<p>OK, that&#8217;s it.  I felt more confident in my predictions last year but it will be interesting to see.  I am now heading to some other prediction sites to see how I compare to the &#8220;experts.&#8221;<br />
Any thoughts?</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong></p>
<p>I only got 25 out of 30.  The only one I got completely was Best Actress.  Kinda disappointing.  But I did name all the ones in my potential spoilers so that means no true shocks except Dreamgirls getting shut out of best picture.  When I saw that Condon was not nominated for Director I sensed it was coming.  But I thought it was a lock. I must make a mental note to myself: never underestimate the Academy&#8217;s love for Clint Eastwood.<br />
It&#8217;s a wide open field.  Should be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2007/01/22/predicting-the-oscar-nominations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Snakes on a Plane&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/08/18/is-snakes-on-a-plane/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/08/18/is-snakes-on-a-plane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/2006/08/18/is-snakes-on-a-plane/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;the greatest movie ever made? That&#8217;s arguable. It&#8217;s definitely fun. But there is no debate that Samuel L. Jackson is the coolest man on the planet.  I&#8217;m smelling Oscar. In the coming weeks I will be doing a series on the theological implications of Snakes on a Plane. We will look at the eschatological and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;the greatest movie ever made?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s arguable. It&#8217;s definitely fun.</p>
<p>But there is no debate that Samuel L. Jackson is the coolest man on the planet.  I&#8217;m smelling Oscar.</p>
<p>In the coming weeks I will be doing a series on the theological implications of Snakes on a Plane.</p>
<p>We will look at the eschatological and soteriological aspects of the film.  Join in on the discussion.</p>
<p>Anybody seen it? Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/08/18/is-snakes-on-a-plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Gets It Right</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/03/05/oscar-gets-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/03/05/oscar-gets-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 03:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;I would agree that Brokeback is a lock to win. However, Oscar is notorious for its backlash. Brokeback is peaking too soon (Remember Saving Private Ryan) and a traditionally conservative academy could award something else. I&#8217;m sensing a ground-swell for Crash. Those raves are coming. Remember it was an early release so it needs to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://scottfreeman.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/crash_ver5_3.jpg"><img width="127" height="188" border="0" alt="Crash_ver5_3" src="http://scottfreeman.typepad.com/my_weblog/images/crash_ver5_3.jpg" /></a>&#8220;I would agree that Brokeback is a lock to win. However, Oscar is<br />
notorious for its ba</em><em>ckl</em><em>ash. Brokeback is peaking too soon (Remember<br />
Saving Private Ryan) and a traditionally conservative academy could<br />
award something else. I&#8217;m sensing a ground-swell for Crash. Those raves<br />
are coming. Remember it was an early release so it needs to be<br />
refreshed in the memories of people.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I wrote that almost two months ago. I just wish I had been bold enough to stick with that prediction last week. Instead, this is what I said:</p>
<p><strong><em>&#8220;I am holding out hopes that <em>Crash </em>plays the <em>Shakespeare in Love </em>role to <em>Brokeback&#8217;s Schindler&#8217;s List (sic).  </em>Five years from now, when we are out from under the news-worthiness of <em>Brokeback</em> there will be no debate that <em>Crash </em>is the superior film.  I saw it months ago and it still resonates with me.  This could be the biggest shocker of the night.&#8221;<br />
</em></strong></p>
<p>Instead I hedged my bets and went against my gut. But I can truly say that Oscar got it right. Crash is hands down the pic of the year.<strong><em><br />
</em></strong></p>
<p>The only disappointment for me was Dolly Parton losing.  That was a crime.</p>
<p>The only one I missed was Best Supporting Actress.  Not a bad night.</p>
<p>Jon Stewart stumbled a little at the beginning but quickly caught his stride. His brand of intelligent and incisive humor was pitch-perfect in an otherwise paint-by-numbers night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/03/05/oscar-gets-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Predictions</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/03/01/oscar-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/03/01/oscar-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This years races are extremely difficult to predict. While I have seen the majority of nominees, there are a couple of films that have escaped my opportunity to view them. (I am extremely perturbed at Waco&#8217;s failure to screen Capote.) Regardless of what anyone might say, there are no sure things this year. Here are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scottfreeman.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/oscar.JPG"><img width="150" height="217" border="0" alt="Oscar" src="http://scottfreeman.typepad.com/my_weblog/images/oscar.JPG" /></a>This years races are extremely difficult to predict. While I have seen the majority of nominees, there are a couple of films that have escaped my opportunity to view them. (I am extremely perturbed at Waco&#8217;s failure to screen <em>Capote.)  </em><br />
Regardless of what anyone might say, there are no sure things this year.  Here are my best guesses, followed by my preference:</p>
<p><strong>Best Actor</strong><br />
Will Win&#8211;<strong>Philip Seymour Hoffman</strong> for <em>Capote.  </em><br />
Should Win&#8211;This vote might change when I get to see <em>Capote.  </em>But for now, my favorite performance of the year is <strong>Terrence Howard&#8217;s </strong>searing portrayal in <em>Hustle and Flow.<strong /></em></p>
<p><strong><strong>Best Actress<em /></strong><em><br />
Will Win&#8211;<strong>Reese Witherspoon </strong>for <em>Walk the Line</em><br />
Should Win&#8211;I have loved Felicity Huffman since her days on <em>Sports Night </em>but nobody brings the same pathos to a role this year than <strong>Charlize Theron </strong>did to <em>North Country.  </em>Alas, she just won a couple of years back.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong><br />
Will Win&#8211;<strong>George Clooney </strong>for <em>Syriana</em><br />
Should Win&#8211;Tremendous line-up of nominees. But Matt Dillon is playing a grown-up version of the character he has always played; Paul Giamatti is being nominated after being robbed the previous two years; Jake Gyllenhaal was not the heart of his movie and William Hurt should not have been nominated in the first place. Therefore, <strong>Clooney </strong>should take the statue.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong><br />
Will Win&#8211;<strong>Michelle Williams </strong>for <em>Brokeback Mountain</em><br />
Should Win&#8211;No one was more intrinsic to their movie than <strong>Amy Adams </strong>was to <em>Junebug.  </em>Every scene she is in belongs solely to her. She can simultaneously elicit laughs and sympathy. The movie is an interminable bore without her presence.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><strong>Best Picture</strong><br />
Will Win&#8211;<em>Brokeback Mountain</em><br />
Should Win&#8211;<em>Crash.  </em>I am holding out hopes that <em>Crash </em>plays the <em>Shakespeare in Love </em>role to <em>Brokeback&#8217;s Schindler&#8217;s List.  </em>Five years from now, when we are out from under the news-worthiness of <em>Brokeback</em> there will be no debate that <em>Crash </em>is the superior film.  I saw it months ago and it still resonates with me.  This could be the biggest shocker of the night.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><strong>Best Director</strong><br />
Will Win&#8211;<strong>Ang Lee</strong> for <em>Brokeback Mountain</em><br />
Should Win&#8211;<strong>Paul Haggis </strong>for <em>Crash.  </em>See Above.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Another race I am looking forward to is best song.  I love all of the nominees but Dolly Parton&#8217;s <em>Travelin&#8217; Thru </em>is one of the best redemption themed songs I&#8217;ve heard in a while.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>What are your thoughts?<br />
</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/03/01/oscar-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academy Award Predictions</title>
		<link>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/01/30/academy-award-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/01/30/academy-award-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottfreeman.info/?p=206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Edited to add: Predictions in bold were correct) I fancy myself somewhat of an amateur Oscar historian. Back about 10 years or so ago I sat out to watch every best picture and best actor winner. I was able to do that except for the first two best actor films. Maybe someday they will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scottfreeman.typepad.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/white_gloves.jpg"><img width="217" height="320" border="0" alt="White_gloves" src="http://scottfreeman.typepad.com/my_weblog/images/white_gloves.jpg" /></a>(Edited to add: Predictions in bold were correct)</p>
<p>I fancy myself somewhat of an amateur Oscar historian. Back about 10 years or so ago I sat out to watch every best picture and best actor winner. I was able to do that except for the first two best actor films. Maybe someday they will be released on video.<br />
If you name a year I can tell you who won best picture or actor for that year The only reason I haven&#8217;t done the same with best actress winners is because I met Tracy and got a life. But I still have seen every major nominee for the last several years. Here are my predictions for the noms coming out tomorrow morning:</p>
<p><strong /></p>
<p><strong /></p>
<p><strong>Best Picture</strong><br />
<strong>Brokeback Mountain<br />
Capote<br />
Crash<br />
Good Night, and Good Luck</strong><br />
Walk the Line<br />
Note&#8211;I maintain that the Academy will go with one non-political film.  Hence, Walk the Line.  If not, expect <strong>Munich</strong> to creep in here.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actor</strong><br />
<strong>Philip Seymour Hoffman (Capote)<br />
Heath Ledger (Brokeback Mountain)<br />
David Strathairn (Good Night, and Good Luck)<br />
Joaquin Phoenix (Walk the Line)<br />
Terrence Howard (Hustle and Flow)</strong><br />
Note: I&#8217;m expecting Howard to knock out Russell Crowe for the fifth slot, although Ralph Fiennes is a contender as well.</p>
<p><strong>Best Actress</strong><br />
<strong>Felicity Huffman (Transamerica)<br />
Reese Witherspoon (Walk the Line)<br />
Charlize Theron (North Country)<br />
Judi Dench (Mrs. Henderson Presents)<br />
Keira Knightly (Pride and Prejudice)</strong><br />
Note: Does the Academy know how to not nominate Judi Dench? Doesn&#8217;t matter. It&#8217;s a two horse race here between Huffman and Witherspoon.</p>
<p><strong>Best Director</strong><br />
<strong>Ang Lee (Brokeback Mountain)<br />
George Clooney (Good Night and Good Luck)<br />
Bennett Miller (Capote)<br />
Steven Spielberg (Munich)<br />
Paul Haggis (Crash)</strong><br />
Note: Mangold is the odd man out here. But Walk the Line isn&#8217;t a best pic contender and the Academy rarely lines up 5 for 5 in Best Picture and Best Director</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actor</strong><br />
<strong>Paul Giamatti (Cinderella Man)<br />
Matt Dillon (Crash)<br />
George Clooney (Syriana)<br />
Jake Gyllenhall (Brokeback Mountain)</strong><br />
Don Cheadle (Crash)<br />
Note: I&#8217;m a huge Clooney fan. I&#8217;m looking for a big night for him. Also will be great to see Giamatti nominated after being robbed two years in a row.</p>
<p><strong>Best Supporting Actress</strong><br />
<strong>Michelle Williams (Brokeback Mountain)<br />
Amy Adams (Junebug)<br />
Rachel Weisz (Constant Gardener)</strong><br />
Maria Bello (A History of Violence)<br />
Laura Linney (The Squid and the Whale)<br />
Note: I really have no clue, although I know that Sandra Bullock deserves a nomination for her sterling performance in the best movie of the year, Crash.</p>
<p>Ok, I am a geek.  You got any thoughts before the noms tomorrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scottfreeman.info/2006/01/30/academy-award-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
