Archive for category Social Conscience

Evangelism 101

I want all people to come to know the love and mercy of Jesus Christ. I long to see disciples made in all reaches of the globe.

Really, I do. Wouldn’t it be great if people were able to truly find the love of Christ in their lives?

I believe that if all people would learn to truly live like Christ, then the world would change: wars would cease, poverty would end, and hunger would abate.

I believe that if I could just learn to truly live like Christ, then people would clamor to know more about why I love so much, give so freely and appear so joyful.

I would make a greater difference than I do. People would see a life not marked by borders, not encumbered with accumulation, and committed to being an image of Him.

What could happen I really committed to live like Jesus?

But it’s too hard.  All that peace-y, love your neighbor, turn your cheek stuff is more than what I signed on for.
So, I have a great evangelistic plan. I will reduce Kingdom living to a list of moral regulations and then force people to live their lives according to those regulations.  Rather than being a model of Christ as an example of how people should live their lives, I’ll just force them to live like me.
And anything that is viewed as a threat to the compulsory living of those regulations I will fight to stop by all means necessary: through protests, legislation and guilt.

I can make disciples through coercion and legislation rather than investing wasting too much time in compassion and love.

I can monitor all forms of entertainment to make sure that they live up to my standards of decency, no matter how subjective that might be, rather than dialoguing with people about the allure of entertainment or providing viable alternatives.

I can seek to block vaccines that could save a young girl’s life from sexually transmitted diseases because the underlying behavior goes against my standards rather than adopt the idea that a life saved today is a potential soul won tomorrow.

I can focus on “standing up for my rights as a Christian” rather than worrying about the rights of the poor, disadvantaged and forgotten.

I can seek to preserve the traditions and history of this “Christian nation” rather than seeking to introduce people to the grace and redemption that comes by being a part of the Kingdom.

I can show how loving I am by pointing my finger at the far fringes of Christianity, those who would spew their hatred without any compunction, rather than seeking to root out any remnants of hatred that lingers in my own heart.

Yes, that’s it.  I will do everything in my power to coax, wheedle, intimidate, and force people into living the life I deem appropriate. God needs me to stand up for the right way of living.  And by so doing, people will line up to become Christians.

Right?  Who’s with me?

An Excerpt to Chew On

I know this quote is long but I encourage to reflect on what is said. Don’t just react if you disagree, but prayerfully consider our need to reassess our faithfulness. It is from Michael Lerner’s tremendous, insightful and indicting book, The Left Hand of God:

When Jews were enslaved by Egyptian imperial power, they were subjected to genocidal measures on the part of Pharoah (who sought to kill all the male children), constant physical oppression, material deprivation, and religious repression. It was in this context that they responded to the death of the Egyptian army sinking into the waters of the sea by celebrating God as “a man of war: and proclaiming, “Your Right Hand O Lord, is Mighty in Power” (Exodus 15:3–6)

Yet history often shows that this is a difficult balance to maintain, because once one justifies using violence and domination over others in some circumstances to overthrow oppressive rule, one can develop a psychological proclivity for using violence to solve one’s pressing problems.

What the prophets saw, and what has happened once again in contemporary Israel, is that the Torah tradition could be used to justify a social order that was in many respects the exact opposite of the loving message of God. When the message of the Right Hand of God, developed for the powerless, is adopted instead by the powerful, existing inequalities and systems of oppression are ignored and calls for social justice, peace and nonviolence are dismissed as pretty thoughts about some future messianic era (for Jews) or a Second Coming (for Christians). Arguing that the “real world” is too dangerous for the demands of the Torah, the Prophets, and Jesus to be taken seriously, the powerful insist that the only path to peace and social justice is to impose their own religous vision on the whole world, and to accept cruelty and injustice as inevitable until that apocalyptic transformation has taken place. The purveyors of this distortion can always refer, as they always have, to external threats as evidence that the world is not yet ready for the transformative call of the Left Hand of God.

Jesus railed against the Jewish establishment of his day, like other prophets had done in their own time, and once again highlighted a commitment to the poor and the oppressed. Jesus insisted that people not duplicate Rome’s oppressive rule in the way that they treated each other. His followers and many early Christians understood this message clearly–understood, as did the powerful in Rome, that it was a revolutionary message calling upon the faithful to reject the power of tyrants and embrace the power of love, which would ultimately be more forceful than anything Rome could deliver. Just as the message of Torah was tragically turned into its opposite by “the religious” and their establishment, so Christianity, taken over by Constantine, became its opposite, a system that provided justification for the powerful while ignoring or even actively subverting the needs of the poor and the powerless…

These perversions of Judaism and Christianity took place in the name of the original vision, drawing on the texts and the justifications that could be found there because at one point those triumphalist texts had provided needed empowerment for the poor and the downtrodden, and had been a psychologically necessary buttress against despair.

In the United States, the powerful have appropriated God and religion to justify imperial rule around the globe. They are not intent on using power to rectify the situation of the powerless. On the contrary, as their domestic moves make clear, they redistribute wealth upward from the poor to the rich. The global system of capital that they have created has had that same impact, increasing the suffering of the powerless while empowering a small class within each society to act as the guardian of the interests of Western capital in third-world countries.

The Religious Right allies with and provides much of the ideological cover for this development. It allows the powerful to worship their own power and then, taking the work of their own hands, declare it the God to be worshipped by all. This is pure idolatry. It allows America, the most powerful and arrogant of all the arrogant and powerful nations that exist today, to identify itself in its own mind with the oppressed children of Israel and thus to imagine that its use of force is divinely sanctioned.

It is long past time that we re-examine the prophets for what they have to teach us about Kingdom, Idolatry and chosenness.

Where I’m At, Part 1

Wherein, I attempt to answer my own questions.

A couple of months ago I did a 10 part series on how I got to where I am spiritually. Today, I begin a series where I wrestle with where I am at currently.

I will do it in the context of the questions I asked yesterday.  The posts in this series will not be static.  My views and positions are in a state of flux as I suss out what it means to be Christ-like.  But, they are my views and positions.  As always, I covet your thoughts.

At what point do we, in the church, get truly serious about weighing all scripture through the person of Jesus Christ?

In John 14:6 Jesus makes his bold pronouncement that he is “the way, and the truth, and the life.”

I imagine that every preacher has a sermon that he can dust off at a moment’s notice on this passage.

“Jesus is the way–there is no other path to salvation.”

“Jesus is the truth–there is an objective standard to understanding what is true and right”

But what about the life?  What does that mean for us?  I propose that it means much more than just a full and complete existence here on earth.  It is more than a joyful approach to day to day living.

When I have preached this passage I have focused more on the abundant life idea and less on the ethical implications of the way Jesus has called us to live.

But Jesus is not merely telling us here about some great blessing or earthly benefit to embracing Him as the Way and the Truth.  He is saying, unequivocally, that to arrive at a fuller knowledge of God we must live our lives the same way Jesus did.

I think, too often, we look at “the life” in this passage as the gift that we can expect from accepting the first two rather than an admonition to live as an embodiment of “the way” and “the truth.” We think more about what Jesus wants to give us rather than what He calls us to give.
To have the true zoe life we must filter our thoughts and actions through the Jesus filter.

We can construct a legitimate argument for war if we rely solely upon OT passages but does it pass the filter of Jesus and the life that he lived?

We can teach our children the need for self-esteem and the right we have to “stand up for ourselves” but does it pass the Jesus filter of meekness and turning the other cheek?

We can justify having enemies because of various ways that we have been wronged but does it pass the Jesus filter of loving them?

We can bog ourselves down in the minutia of scripture magnifying various proof-texts into tests of fellowship and righteousness but does that pass the Jesus filter of loving our neighbor as ourselves?

To truly have “the life,” that abundant life that Jesus promises us, we have to accept the totality of what that life means. That means the ethical implications of the life Jesus lived.

It means that we take up the basin and the towel and live servant lives.

It means that we seek not to exalt ourselves but consider others better than we are.

It means that we practice mercy, even when we don’t feel very merciful.

It means that we never stop advocating for peace over and above “security.”

It means that we be reconcilers seeking first to repair damaged relationships.

It means that we develop greater hearts for the poor.

It means that we value women and their roles in the kingdom.

It means that we seek to minister at the margins of society.

It means that our “borders” are not limited to states or nations but includes all of those for whom Jesus died.

We must be intent on living our lives as Jesus did.  It is increasingly problematic to take rashly developed exegesis of OT passages to justify nation-building and embracing “chosen” status.

The mere fact that God did something does not give us equal license to do the same. He is, after all, God.  And we are not.

But we are called to be Christ-like.  And that means living “the life.”

He is the final arbiter of how we are to live.

A Series of Questions…

This is rattling around in my head right now.  If you have the conclusive (or even a good guess) let me know.

  • At what point do we, in the church, get truly serious about weighing all scripture through the person of Jesus Christ? Isn’t He the resting place for all of our conclusions and approaches to living and loving?
  • Will we ever break away from our proclivity to proof-text our rationales for war, propagating poverty and elevating our spheres of concern over above the needs of those who fall outside of those spheres? God commanding war in the OT is not a good enough reason for me to blindly embrace armed conflict today.
  • What moral obligation do I have to reduce poverty and be a voice for the least of these?  How far-reaching is that?  How much does that affect what I buy, where I shop, etc?
  • Could it be that we have completely blown Romans 13 out of proportion and twisted it completely into an unrecognizable form from its original intent?
  • What does a true ethic of life consist of?  How can I be pro-life and accept the needless death of any individual?
  • When did faith get confused with certainty on every moral question?
  • If the greatest commandments are all that, shouldn’t we be focusing a whole lot more on what it means to love God and love people?
  • Can we lay aside our personal disgust on sins that particularly rankle us to have an open discussion about the true make-up of sinful behavior?
  • Have we so marginalized women in the church that they have no outlet for their gifts and talents? If so, when do we emerge from our patriarichal stone-age?
  • Is there a cure for the frustrations I feel? I’m not getting much sleep right now.

Maybe you can see why I’ve steered more toward humor and such lately.  I have to get out of my head.

Any thoughts?

Moving On

My sermon was not recorded yesterday.  It really bums me because I thought it was a timely treatment of humanity that led into our discussion of stem cell research last night.

I was incredibly pleased with my congregations handling of the discussion last night.  They appeared to take a much more scientific, pro-technology stance than I anticipated.  They quickly seized on the emptiness of the “playing God” critique, the chasm between “potential human” and “actual human,” and the responsibility we have to those who are with us now.
May our ethics have the time necessary to catch up with our technology.

All of you who participated in the discussion were acknowledge at the beginning.

My next subject is Intelligent Design: or why we are so bent on being at war with science.

Give me your thoughts on this.  What do you think about the intelligent design debate? Why do we bump heads with science so regularly? How do we overcome that?

Continuing the Discussion

If you haven’t been following the discussion from the “Stem Cell” entry.  I want to bring some thoughts to the forefront.  Jeff Richardson argues that we need to acknowledge the inevitability of our direction and develop consistency on some important issues:

Unrestricted personal freedom – no matter how much governmental oppression it requires – is our destiny. It is a Dickian dystopia approaching quickly where personhood will become a highly subjective classification unless moral voices can somehow reverse the trend of personal choice and the veneration of human life (as opposed to its sanctity).

Christians, to be “successful” with issues like abortion, stem cell research, GMH, cloning, etc. are going to have to go back to the drawing board and develop a consistent position on human life (biology), personhood (theology) and freedom (policy). Otherwise, little by little, we will continue to lose ground on what I believe to be a “high view” of humanity.

So, I ask you, wise reader: What does it mean to be human?  How do we live as salt and life in this world?  In what ways do we best love God and love His people?

Help Me Teach a Class

This Sunday night our topic will be Stem Cell Research.  Honestly, my knowledge on this subject is extremely limited.

What are your thoughts?  What are our moral obligations to the sick who would benefit from this?

How do we proceed and maintain a consistent ethic of human life?

What the heck is it, in the first place?

Give me your thoughts.  If I use your stuff, I’ll give you a shout-out in the podcast.

A Trip to the Library

One of my greatest thrills in life is going to the library with no expectations and finding great books to read.

Call me a nerd.  I can take it.

The past few months I’ve been mired in Taylor Branch’s masterful trilogy on America in the King Years. It was startling to realize how little I had been taught about the Civil Rights Movement growing up.  If you never have, then please read these books.

In between those installments, I was catching up on the more “theological” stuff on my shelf: Themes of the OT, Understanding Jewish Culture, N.T. Wright, Dallas Willard, etc.

Now, I take a break from all that.  It’s time for a little lighter reading. Yesterday I went to the Library and picked up these books:

The Wal-Mart Effect : How the World’s Most Powerful Company Really Works–and How It’s Transforming the American Economy by Charles Fishman.  I have a love/hate relationship with Wal-Mart.  This book, so far, strikes me as a balanced assessment of the beast that is Wal-Mart.

Help at Any Cost: How the Troubled-Teen Industry Cons Parents and Hurts Kids by Maia Szalavitz .  I am completely ignorant about the contents of this book.   It is apparently a look at the “tough-love” approach to teen boot camps and what-not.  Looks promising.

An Ordinary Man: An Autobiography by Paul Rusesabagina.  I am really looking forward to read this, although I disagree with the title.  Rusesabagina is no ordinary man.  He is a hero and everyone should read his story.  It humbles me to think that people live through the emotional equivalent of Hurricane Katrina every day in Africa.

That should last me a week or so.  What are you reading right now?

I Had a Blog Post Today…

…but I deleted it.

Therefore, I will not blog today.

I was going to blog about the anger I feel about the injustice, hatred and mean-spiritedness I witness all too often in the world today.

But, I removed it, because it seemed too angry and mean-spirited on my part.

So, I’ll just keep quiet and lay low. I’ll remain quiet out of the fear of offending. I’ll still my voice in order to avoid stirring the waters of public debate and frustration.

Nope, no blogging today.

I’m probably wrong anyway.

  • I’m probably wrong to care less about the USA than I do the Kingdom of God.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that war is wrong and violence is never the answer.
  • I’m probably wrong to view children of Iraqi’s to be as precious as my own.
  • I’m probably wrong to want my children to go to public school (even though I support Private education and have benefited from it) so they can learn at an early age to be salt and light.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that laws are often misguided and the health of a nation depends upon dissent against civil rights abuses. Maybe Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr shouldn’t be heroes of mine.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that it means something that the one time Jesus talked about judgment He did so in regards to how we treat the poor and the forgotten.
  • I’m probably wrong to interpret grace into Old Testament laws of dealing with sojourners and aliens.
  • I’m probably wrong to worry about genocide and AIDS in other lands when there is so much here to be concerned about like Brangelina’s baby.
  • I’m probably wrong to want to love more than I judge.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that hatred runs deep into the fabric of American society–against gays, illegal immigrants, the French, Democrats, Republicans, minorities, or whatever group catches our ire at this particular point in time.
  • I’m probably wrong about worrying about having too much “stuff.” I should just suck it up and buy a new car since the one I’m driving doesn’t have air conditioning in this Texas heat.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that the words of Jesus should propel us to make peace, love enemies, and deny self.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that political parties cannot be champions of the Kingdom due to differing agendas.
  • I’m probably wrong to feel so discontent with the state of the church’s compassion, love and humanity for the lost, disaffected, poor and foreigner.
  • I’m probably wrong to feel so much regret for all the times I’ve harbored hatred, hurled ethnic slurs, branded sinful people with vitriolic names, and supported agendas that suited me at the expense of others.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that being stewards of God’s creation means care for the creation and not just domination of it.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe the greatest terrorist threat is not one of flesh and blood.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that it is a travesty that so many cannot afford insurance.
  • I’m probably wrong to believe that liberals can be Christians despite what some might say.

So, instead of blogging today, I’ll just keep my mouth shut.  I’ll not unburden my heart.

Cause, I’m probably wrong.

Although I sure don’t feel like I am.

In fact, I feel like I’m getting closer to the heart of Jesus.

And I really pray I’m not wrong about that.

Thoughts and Observations

From a year of studying the Old Testament:

  1. We often view God as Creator in the past tense.  I’m afraid that we approach those initial 6 days as the totality of His creating.  But there is so much that He is still doing.
  2. I’m struck by the cyclization of the Israelite people: from Exile to Exodus to Establishing to Establishment/Evil back to Exile.  I don’t have this fleshed out completely, but I believe there is much warning for us in that.
  3. You can preach Jesus from every single book of the OT, a worthwhile study of the enormity of “The Word.”
  4. God and the Israelites were not on the same page when it came to the temple.
  5. God and the Israelites were not on the same page when it came to the nation.
  6. God and the Israelites were usually not on the same page.
  7. I wonder how often we are on the same page with God.
  8. The Prophets may well be the most misinterpreted segment of Scripture.  Over and over, preparing my sermons, I saw other preachers drawing parallels between Israel and the United States.  This is a flawed, and ultimately, unhealthy exegesis.  The modern day parallel is between Israel and the church.
  9. All institutions will fall.  All that remains will be those faithful to Him.
  10. God loves the poor and the forgotten.  He really loves them.
  11. God is angered when we ignore the poor and forgotten.
  12. God is angered when we give our allegiance to anything over and above Him.
  13. He is so incredibly patient.
  14. Don’t be on the wrong side when His patience abates, however.  The “Day of the Lord” is a frightful thing for the idolatrous and oppressive.
  15. God is as graceful in the Old Testament as He is in the New.
  16. Jesus was, and is, the ultimate in-breaking of the Kingdom of God.
  17. Jesus would ultimately turn upside down the Israelite notions of Kingdom, Nation, Rule, Law, Politics, Temple, Sabbath and Community.
  18. I believe He often does the same thing with our 21st Century Western notions of those things as well.
  19. While He was, and is, King, in the minds of many He was the anti-King.
  20. Reading the Old Testament with Messianic expectancy is a beautiful under-taking.
  21. Our stubborn refusal to regularly take spiritual inventory of our own lives should slow us from being too condescending to the immorality of the Jewish people.
  22. He is God.

I have so many more thoughts, but that’s enough for now.  What thoughts do you have?